In article
>,
Sheldon > wrote:

> On Sep 6, 8:13?am, Stan Horwitz > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > ?blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
> >
> > > >>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
> >
> > > > Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?
> >
> > > she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.
> >
> > If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> > convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> > Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> > would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> > with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> > hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
> >
> > The reason for Palin's retreat is obvious. She was poorly vetted.
> > McCain's campaign staff are stuck with her so the best they could do in
> > this sort period of time is to send her back to Alaska in the hopes that
> > she won't open her mouth in public and give us even more evidence that
> > she's a lying hypocrite with ideas that are totally out of step with
> > moderate and independent voters who McCain needs to woe over.
> >
> > While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
> > life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
> > bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
> > And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
> > actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
> > lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
> > state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.
>
> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.

Not ridiculous at all, and not a product of my imagination. What I said
in the posting above is all easily verified by non-biased sources.