Pan wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:28:41 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
> >> You don't see a difference?
> >> Her daddy worked his ass off earning, and he left it to Cindy.
> >> Michelle gets a 160% raise from health corporation, when her husband
> >> became senator.
> >> And the health corporation, get a government grant the next year.
> >>
> >> One is hard work, the other is tax money, and Chicago politics.
> >
> >yes i see a difference, you imbecile. michelle *worked at a job*, and
> >apparently was damned good at it. cindy did jack shit.
> >
> >blake
>
> O.K. I'm an imbecile, because I see corruption, and you see a standard
> 160% raise, due to her husband becoming senator, and then just a
> unconnected grant, of taxpayers money.
> If you can't see anything wrong in this scenario,there is no reason to
> continue this discussion.


blake doesn't know any better, he hasn't seen the sheer corruption of
Illannoy and Chicago politics *up close*...and Obama is a *direct* product
of that brand of politics, one could call him the "Rosemary's Baby" of that
particular brand of corruption.

Obama didn't start out as an agent for "change" on the local Illinois level,
and he's no different now. Peeps that think otherwise is jus' naive...


--
Best
Greg