"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
5.247...
> On Sun 14 Sep 2008 06:10:38a, Dave Smith told us...
>
>> Orlando Enrique Fiol wrote:
>>> wrote:
>>>> First, nigs on welfare. Because
>>>> these women can't seem to understand the concept of using birth
>>>> control and because they appear all to eager to spread their legs to
>>>> any Tom, Dick or Tyrone, our government is left footing the bill for
>>>> the resulting future car thieves. A solution? Cut off all benefits
>>>> after 1 year. Educate the ones who want it so they can find a real job
>>>> and above all, keep up with current affairs in our nation's welfare
>>>> program. There is no shortage of liberal ass polyps in suits out there
>>>> lobbying for even more rights for these lazy sloths.
>>>
>>> Contrary to your portrayal, most welfare recipients are actually single
>>> white men. What would you suggest we do with them?
>>
>> This is not the first time I have seen someone make the claim that the
>> most welfare recipients are white men. there by invalidating the common
>> sense and anecdotal observation on the gender and race of welfare
>> recipients as factually inaccurate and therefore false and racist.
>>
>> Many of them are neither men nor women. They are children. Five
>> million of the 14 million people on welfare in the US are children. Of
>> the adults, 38% are white, outnumbering African Americans who account
>> for 37%. Technically there is a greater percentage of blacks on welfare
>> than whites....1% more, but blacks make up only 12% of the population.
>> Of the adults on welfare, 90% of them are women.
>>
>> In other words...... your claim that most welfare recipients are
>> actually single white males is absolutely false.
>>
>> http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/myths.html
>>
>
> Whatever... Maybe it's time we imposed penalties on adult welfare
> recipients and limited the number of children a welfare recipient could
> have to 1, also limiting the benefits they could receive. What you can't
> afford to have, you shouldn't have. It's no wonder there are so many
> children on the welfare rolls. One of the things that irritates me most
> is
> seeing an indigent family or single mother marching into the welfare
> office
> with 8 kids in tow, because most of these people are unemployed by choice
> or lack of even the most rudimentary skills, and have no desire to work.
> With our present system they know they don't have to, yet they keep
> popping
> out kids like it ws a hobby, and they know they'll receive additional
> benefits for each child they have.
>
> There are some who are making every effort to pull themselves up by their
> bootstraps and to work or actively seek employment. Unfortunately, they
> seem to be in the vast minority.
>

Are all of you bitches forgetting how drastically the welfare rolls were
reduced during President Clinton's two administrations?