On Sep 14, 1:46*pm, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
> "hahabogus" > wrote
>
> > The idea is to break this cycle in welfare recipience. It is a well known
> > cycle...the problem is the fix hasn't been found yet.
>
> Where I live they put a 5 year lifetime limit on welfare. *Last
> I heard, you didn't get extra funds if you had additional children
> after you were on welfare. *That's a simple overview, but you
> get the idea. *Training programs were set up for people who
> needed it.
>
> It might not be perfect, but it's a step in the right direction.
> Nothing wrong with If you can work, work.
>
> nancy

Where do you live and has anyone actually looked at the results of
this idea?

Every once in a while some state or province or country tries
something this dumb and it flops because it is a stupid political
response to a complex socio-economic problem.

It really sound like a good idea until you start to think of what
happens when people get tosssed off welfare.

Of course, a lot just die so that helps solve the problem. This is
what happens when you just cut welfare payments not stop them
completely. http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/Gallery...evolution6.pdf

Or you can die of heat stroke in an apartment in Sudbury if you make a
mistake and illegally combine welfare and student loans.

Of course, a lot of the kids can go into the enterainment industry-
kiddy porn sells well,

As the kids get older they can move into real prostitution and perhaps
some mugging and B&Es, often a favourite carreer path for young
males.

Drug dealing is always an attractive option particularly if it is
combined with membership in a elite gang with cool colours.

John Kane Kingston