On Sep 14, 3:18*pm, Wayne Boatwright >
wrote:
> On Sun 14 Sep 2008 09:27:29a, Dave Smith told us...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >> On Sun 14 Sep 2008 06:10:38a, Dave Smith told us...
>
> >>> Orlando Enrique Fiol wrote:
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> First, nigs on welfare. Because
> >>>>> these women can't seem to understand the concept of using birth
> >>>>> control and because they appear all to eager to spread their legs to
> >>>>> any Tom, Dick or Tyrone, our government is left footing the bill for
> >>>>> the resulting future car thieves. A solution? Cut off all benefits
> >>>>> after 1 year. Educate the ones who want it so they can find a real
> >>>>> job and above all, keep up with current affairs in our nation's
> >>>>> welfare program. There is no shortage of liberal ass polyps in suits
> >>>>> out there lobbying for even more rights for these lazy sloths.
> >>>> Contrary to your portrayal, most welfare recipients are actually
> >>>> single white men. What would you suggest we do with them?
> >>> This is not the first time I have seen someone make the claim that the
> >>> most welfare recipients are white men. there by invalidating the
> >>> common sense and anecdotal observation on the gender and race of
> >>> welfare recipients as factually inaccurate and therefore false and
> >>> racist.
>
> >>> Many of them are neither men nor women. *They are children. *Five
> >>> million of the 14 million people on welfare in the US are children.
> >>> Of the adults, 38% are white, outnumbering African Americans *who
> >>> account for 37%. *Technically there is a greater percentage of blacks
> >>> on welfare than whites....1% more, but blacks make up only 12% of the
> >>> population. Of the adults on welfare, 90% of them are women.
>
> >>> In other words...... your claim that most welfare recipients are
> >>> actually single white males is absolutely false.
>
> >>> * *http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/myths.html
>
> >> Whatever... *Maybe it's time we imposed penalties on adult welfare
> >> recipients and limited the number of children a welfare recipient could
> >> have to 1, also limiting the benefits they could receive. *What you
> >> can't afford to have, you shouldn't have. *It's no wonder there are so
> >> many children on the welfare rolls. *One of the things that irritates
> >> me most is seeing an indigent family or single mother marching into the
> >> welfare office with 8 kids in tow, because most of these people are
> >> unemployed by choice or lack of even the most rudimentary skills, and
> >> have no desire to work. *With our present system they know they don't
> >> have to, yet they keep popping out kids like it ws a hobby, and they
> >> know they'll receive additional benefits for each child they have.
>
> >> There are some who are making every effort to pull themselves up by
> >> their bootstraps and to work or actively seek employment.
> >> Unfortunately, they seem to be in the vast minority.
>
> > I don't know what the solution is. You can't let them starve, but I
> > resent having to help support people who will not support themselves and
> > those who cannot support themselves and then have more children than
> > they cannot afford. * I also resent the attempts to insinuate that those
> > who point out the obvious are passed off as sexist and racist by
> > claiming that most welfare recipients are single white men. The facts do
> > not support that. In fact, it is the exact opposite.
>
> Indeed, and I don't know what the solution is either. *I just know that the
> current system is grossly unfair to those who make every effort to support
> themselves and their families and end up paying for those who don't.
Reform the education system, put a lot , and I mean a lot, of money
into neo-natal cre and early childhood education, change some of the
labour and welfare laws that usually work to make it better to stay on
welfare, institute a decent health care system that covers the working
poor.
Try spending money on programs to rehabilitate prisonners, rather than
warehousing them. Include real vocational training.
> Too bad there isn't an unpopulated island somewhere where they could all be
> shipped.
>
Australia is not accepting new immigrants. Oh and the Brits still have
crime and welfare problems
John Kane Kingston ON Canada