milesh wrote:

> Thats just a dictionary definition which changes through time to suit
> current trends. I already showed the historical basis as it is known
> for the origination of the word. There are several theories so no
> one quite knows for sure. However, each of the generally accepted
> accounts for its origination does not define it as a form of cooking.
> The very 1st proven written use of the word in the USA was in regards
> to a social gathering.


These guys tout 'Tradition' but tradition from
> when?

I'd like to show you a good ol' southern tradition.
Whyn't you come down south and experience it firsthand?

To put it plain and simple, we don't put up with your kind down here. You'd
find yourself in a sinkhole or a swamp quicker than you could say, "I was
just kidding."

Certainly not from the original use of the word as historians
> have found. Guess it depends on your time frame from when you are
> allowed to rewrite history.

And the original Barbacoa was used to cook humans. You see, there's a
reason we strayed a bit from *real* tradition.

TFM®