In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:57:19 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > "Graham" > wrote:
> >
> >> What about PSA? IME, few public systems pay for that in spite of it being
> >> more effective as a cancer screen than mammograms.
> >> Graham
> >
> > PSA and TPSA have been shown to be NOT 100% reliable. That's probably
> > why. The digital exam is generally more accurate, if "unpleasant".
> > Take it like a man. The "annual indignity" for females is no less
> > "uncomfortable". :-P
>
> but women grow up having doctors (and others) sticking doodads up their
> whatnot. men at fifty are more squeamish about it.
>
> your pal,
> blake

Depends on the man... <g>
--
Peace! Om

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed." --Mark Twain