"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:17:37 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> Saerah Gray wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> What about PSA? IME, few public systems pay for that in spite of it
>>>>>> being more effective as a cancer screen than mammograms.
>>>>>> Graham
>>>>> PSA and TPSA have been shown to be NOT 100% reliable. That's probably
>>>>> why. The digital exam is generally more accurate, if "unpleasant".
>>>>> Take it like a man. The "annual indignity" for females is no less
>>>>> "uncomfortable". :-P
>>>> but women grow up having doctors (and others) sticking doodads up
>>>> their whatnot. men at fifty are more squeamish about it.
>>>>
>>>> your pal,
>>>> blake
>>>
>>> I am laughing at the phrase "doodads up their whatnot". Still.
>>
>> Some whatnots are designed to allow doodad entry. Others are not.
>>
>
> i hear some folks Find a Way.
>
But in the end (pardon the pun) their whatnots are not happy.