On Sep 20, 5:17*pm, Dave Smith > wrote:
> Saerah Gray wrote:
>
> >>>> What about PSA? *IME, few public systems pay for that in spite of it
> >>>> being more effective as a cancer screen than mammograms.
> >>>> Graham
> >>> PSA and TPSA have been shown to be NOT 100% reliable. That's probably
> >>> why. *The digital exam is generally more accurate, if "unpleasant". *
> >>> Take it like a man. The "annual indignity" for females is no less
> >>> "uncomfortable". :-P
> >> but women grow up having doctors (and others) sticking doodads up
> >> their whatnot. *men at fifty are more squeamish about it.
>
> >> your pal,
> >> blake
>
> > I am laughing at the phrase "doodads up their whatnot". Still.
>
> Some whatnots are designed to allow doodad entry. Others are not.

A pelvic exam is "bimanual". That is, access to two whatnots is
performed
simultaneously.

You guys are weak...

Cindy Hamilton