On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:19:51 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:17:37 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Saerah Gray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> What about PSA? IME, few public systems pay for that in spite of it
>>>>>>> being more effective as a cancer screen than mammograms.
>>>>>>> Graham
>>>>>> PSA and TPSA have been shown to be NOT 100% reliable. That's probably
>>>>>> why. The digital exam is generally more accurate, if "unpleasant".
>>>>>> Take it like a man. The "annual indignity" for females is no less
>>>>>> "uncomfortable". :-P
>>>>> but women grow up having doctors (and others) sticking doodads up
>>>>> their whatnot. men at fifty are more squeamish about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> your pal,
>>>>> blake
>>>>
>>>> I am laughing at the phrase "doodads up their whatnot". Still.
>>>
>>> Some whatnots are designed to allow doodad entry. Others are not.
>>>
>>
>> i hear some folks Find a Way.
>>
> But in the end (pardon the pun) their whatnots are not happy.

but i hear sometimes the corners turn up in a nether smile.

your pal,
blake