"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:19:51 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:17:37 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> Saerah Gray wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about PSA? IME, few public systems pay for that in spite of
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> being more effective as a cancer screen than mammograms.
>>>>>>>> Graham
>>>>>>> PSA and TPSA have been shown to be NOT 100% reliable. That's
>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>> why. The digital exam is generally more accurate, if "unpleasant".
>>>>>>> Take it like a man. The "annual indignity" for females is no less
>>>>>>> "uncomfortable". :-P
>>>>>> but women grow up having doctors (and others) sticking doodads up
>>>>>> their whatnot. men at fifty are more squeamish about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your pal,
>>>>>> blake
>>>>>
>>>>> I am laughing at the phrase "doodads up their whatnot". Still.
>>>>
>>>> Some whatnots are designed to allow doodad entry. Others are not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> i hear some folks Find a Way.
>>>
>> But in the end (pardon the pun) their whatnots are not happy.
>
> but i hear sometimes the corners turn up in a nether smile.
>

Wanna try a spearmint? *EG*