On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:46:44 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>>>
>>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most.
>>>>> i understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
>>>> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15
>>>> nicknames, I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
>
>>>> The Fine Print:
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
>>>
>>> o.k., let me think about it.
>>>
>>> but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those
>>> i think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
>>> egotism and to give the appearance of fairness).
>>>
>>> you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>>
>> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
>> (before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these
>> are people i have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing,
>> but that i remember folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>>
>> Gregory Morrow
>> Bob Terwilliger
>> Dave Smith
>> cybercat
>> Andy
>> Sheldon
>> "Pete C."
>> jmcquown
>> Paco
>> Goomba
>> "Paul M. Cook"
>> PeterL
>> sf
>> TFM®
>> Lou Decruss
>> ChattyCathy
>> Omelet
>> Sqwertz
>> blake murphy
>>
>> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> You didn't read The Fine Print...
>
> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.

well, you could pare the list to fifteen or i could.

your pal,
blake