On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:59:18 GMT, in rec.food.cooking, Wayne Boatwright
wrote:

> On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...
>
>>
>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>> .25...
>>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>>> 5.247:
>>>
>>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>>>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>>> effective.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>>
>>> I happen to be a person.
>>
>> And a very nice one at that.
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> I have no problem with Peter himself.

It's a well know fact you want that fat, sweaty pig wallowing all over you.

> It's all the insanity going on about and around him.

What planet are you on? Lucas causes the chaos. He thrives on it. If you
don't see it you are a sicker **** that he is.


> I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the situation with his own responses to this idiocy.

What did you do? Find a clue?

> It would be better for everyone,
> Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or commenting on
> these issues. Totally ignoring this kind of problem usually makes it go
> away. The so called trolls and stalkers eventually give up when no one
> pays them any attention.
>
> Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.

Too late for it to go away Nancy boy. We will be here as long as Lucas is
here.