Bob Muncie wrote:

> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>
>> Usually I'd agree with you. But I also re-subscribed to a.b.f. and
>> there must have indeed been a 'blip'. Saw several (smallish) images
>> that had 'snuck through'. However the majority of the threads had no
>> posts with attachments in them. My theory is that if a post is under
>> a certain size/number of lines it may be allowed by motz. But that's
>> just my theory. Anyway, I'd rather just pay my few bucks every few
>> years and see all the binaries I want. Motz is great for text groups
>> tho' - and it's free.
>>
>
> Chatty Cathy -
>
> I wasn't pointing out that anyone was wrong. I was just describing my
> experience as I registered for the free service on Motz yesterday, so
> you really have nothing to disagree with :-)
>
> You can have as many "blips" as you want to and I shan't complain.
>
> Bob

<G> Wasn't saying you were wrong either, Bob... was just saying that
I've never seen any binary posts on a.b.f. there before either (and I
thought motz just didn't carry them) - but somehow several binary posts
were indeed there when I re-subscribed - I saw them myself. (e.g.
there's one from Big Jim in the "Chess anuone?" thread (his typo, not
mine <veg>), and a few other posts as well.)

FWIW, I haven't found a free news feed (yet) that carries all the
binaries; don't blame them - takes up a lot of bandwidth and/or server
space, which has to be paid for...
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy