TV or not TV. That is the question.
George wrote:
> Thats something I just don't get. Lets say you own a TV station and
> can reach 100,000 households. The price you can get for advertising
> etc is
> all realted to viewers. At no cost to you someone increases your reach
> to say 125,000 households. What justification would you have to
> charge them?
I don't understand, the new 25,000 should get it for free?
Regardless, you'd do the same if you owned a company,
you'd take the opportunity to make money.
nancy
|