On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:44:27 GMT, "Scarlet Pimpernel"
> wrote:

>
>"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:27:00 GMT, "StocksRus®"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in
>> ws.com:
>> >
>> >> Eddie wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:25:23 GMT, bbq > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Default User wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>Kyle Tucker wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>Mine arrived yesterday - so 10 days from order. And as another plus,
>> >>>>>>it came with a free cover inside the box. Not sure if that's always
>> >>>>>>included, but it's labeled outside as if it's a bonus. I'll try to
>> >>>>>>break it in this weekend if we get out of the 20's.
>> >>>
>> >>> I ordered on the 12th and it was shipped on the 16th and arrived on
>> >>> the 20th. Four days from Kentucky to my front door. Not bad.
>> >>> Not a scratch on it either. A beautiful, well-made grill. Very
>> >>> impressed with workmanship. Tight detail. Reminds me of my Rolex.
>> >>> :-)
>> >>
>> >> How many racks of ribs can you get on your Rolex?
>> >>
>> >> Matthew
>> >
>> >Mine sits in my dresser. Four times had it worked on and cleaned and it
>> >still loses about 4 minutes a day.
>>
>> OT - is it a mechanical works? If so it's not the watch - it's you.
>> I too can take a superbly crafted mecahnical watch and wear it for a
>> couple of days and it is a guarantee that the thing will be 12-15
>> minutes slow after two days. My wife can then put it and it will be
>> spot for bloody ever. Electronic time pieces work fine for me. I
>> have read where people like me [and you] show up once in a while.
>>
>
>Magnetic personality?
>
>
and exceptionally good looks too ;0)
Harry