Default User wrote:
> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>
>> Bob Muncie > news:tFrcl.44873$Nv1.4716
>> @newsfe03.iad: in rec.food.cooking
>
>>> Is there a reason why a post about a cook on food network should be
>>> somewhere other then the alt.tv.food-network when it's about a cook
>>> from that channel?
>> Because it spans several different groups with cross topics. It is
>> about television, FoodTV and cooking. Is there a reason it should not
>> be posted in the other groups?
>
> And this way it might get read by more than 12 people.
>
>
>
>
> Brian
>

If it's going to be read by more then twelve people, shouldn't they
subscribe to the *right* USENET group? BTW, the SLOP derogatory reviews
are *not* about cooking in my opinion. And yes, you are welcome to yours.

This is my last reply to this stupid thread that's cross posted in
appropriate groups.

Michael - You can be fascinated by whatever amuses you. Obviously you
are amused by most anything.

Myself, I am not amused by people inappropriately posting in the groups
I read if a better group exists for them. It wastes my time looking at
those posts. I also don't want a gazillion filter rules as it wastes
computing time.

I have an idea! How about people post in groups that were created for
them? Now there is an idea who's time has come.