On Feb 17, 5:31*pm, "C.D" > wrote:
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "C.D" > wrote in message
> .com...
>
> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >>> "Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>> Today, a share of New York Times stock dropped lower than a copy of
> >>>> New York Times Sunday edition. * * *Isn't this exciting??
>
> >>> No, it really is dull. Didn't you have all the excitement you could take
> >>> under Bush's administration? Didn't all the torture and scandals keep
> >>> you titillated? The poverty, the gross abuse of power and trust?
>
> >> c'mon. you have to know that one single administration could not possibly
> >> be the cause of all this. in a sense we are all guilty. *some for being
> >> really greedy and some for being really stupid. it's a twofer.
>
> > I was talking about actions taken directly by the Bush administration and
> > their proven outcomes.
>
> > But, sure, I will admit that Bush's administration is about as responsible
> > for some aspects of the horrow as Barack is for the stock market losses..
>
> don't get me wrong...i think obama hasn't even had a chance yet to see the
> full scope. i blame reagan , clinton, and bush 1 &2. it's been a long time
> coming. we are nothing more than a consumer economy...(U.S) with basically
> no products worth exporting. the whole "global economy" theory has blown up
> and it will never be the same.

I agree completely. This is the violent, convulsive death of
Reaganomics.

"Are we on unsinkable, America today? In case of the unthinkable,
who's gonna have to pay?"
-- Mayday, by The Bonobos

Oh, and I'd just like to add that, "Hey baby, wanna stimulate my
package?, is NOT a well thought out pickup line.
>
> --
> C.D

--Bryan