"Kathleen" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:34:05 -0600, Pete C. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Let's hope when those embryos become real people that they'll feel the
>>>>>same
>>>>>enthusiasm about how they were brought to be as their parents surely
>>>>>did.
>>>>>To me it seems like they are an incredibly self absorbed couple.
>>>>>
>>>>>Paul
>>>>
>>>>I see your view as nothing but judgmental and homophobic.
>>>>
>>>>My view is that they are a couple who decided to have children and had
>>>>to use medical technology to overcome fertility issues, no different
>>>>than a heterosexual couple doing the same.
>>>
>>>i'm not sure what the problem is here, either. also, it's not unknown
>>>for
>>>hetero woman to have a kid as some kind of accessory item without
>>>resorting
>>>to technology.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as *** couples raising kids, I am by no means against it. The
>> ones I have seen often have the nicest kids. The *** couples I have
>> known just seem to try a whole lot harder. But things are already hard
>> enough on them as it is so why introduce more confusion? Embryo swapping
>> was just a cool thing to do because they could do it but fraught with
>> potential consequences that could make things very hard down the road if
>> all does not go to plan. The baby rabies claims many victims.
>>
>> Paul
>
> Oh shut up.

I try, oh how I try.

> Infertility is the CAUSE of stress on relationships, ***, straight or
> otherwise, not the result. The kids are incredibly resilient and
> accepting.

Adoption? If you want to be a parent so bad, why not be one to a child
already born? That would be a gift to humanity.

> The rest of us need to get the **** over it.

Paul