Thread: Cat Cora
View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Pete C. Pete C. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,847
Default Cat Cora


"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> er.com...
> >
> > "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
> >>
> >> >> And don't confuse biology with law in this case. The
> >> >> egg donor or the woman who caried the baby to term? It's a really
> >> >> sticky
> >> >> point of law and when these cases land in court it is a nightmare to
> >> >> resolve. And usually the children are left severly damaged in the
> >> >> process.
> >> >
> >> > Surrogacy is reasonably well established in the legal system. The
> >> > mother
> >> > is the source of the egg, the father the sperm (donor), the surrogate
> >> > is
> >> > the one who carried the baby.
> >>
> >> In the case of a surrogacy contract only. Of which you would not have in
> >> the case of a marriage where one of the spouses is also the surrogate.
> >> So
> >> you have a real conflict between spousal rights and surrogacy claims in
> >> absence of a contract that would get really messy. Seems to be either
> >> individual would be in a bind. One one hand they would have all rights
> >> as a
> >> spouse regards the children and on the other no rights absent a surrogacy
> >> contract because the child they carried to term was not genetically their
> >> own as they doubled as a surrogate for thir on spouse. Now remove the
> >> ***
> >> factor here and imagine trying to apply the same laws equally here
> >> between a
> >> straight couple and a *** couple. IANL but I see some real equal
> >> protection
> >> isues here.
> >>
> >> King Solomon would go apeshit over that one.
> >>
> >> Paul

> >
> > Yep, nothing but homophobic bias there, clearly shown by your
> > implication that a married couple should forgo having children because
> > your homophobic society thinks they will invariably get divorced and is
> > uncomfortable considering normal spousal custody issues in the context
> > of a marriage they don't approve of.

>
> You're a ****ing brain dead idiot and I suspect quite a bigot if you see
> homophobia at every turn. You see the world through the same lense that you
> use to project onto others. I'll explain to my *** neighbors and ***
> relations that I am a closet homphobe. They'll need to know.
>
> Paul


Nope, you're the one with the issues. I see a couple having children,
nothing more, while you see "issues".