"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Pete C. wrote:
>
>>> It's not homophobic to say that something is weird,
>>
>> Care to tell me what is "weird" about a couple wanting to have children
>> and using medical technology to overcome fertility issues? It's only
>> "weird" if you are biased against the couple for some reason i.e. you're
>> homophobic.
>
> It's not weird to want children. It *is* weird to use medical technology
> to
> overcome fertility issues, regardless of whether the people involved are
> straight or ***. Your hyperreactivity shows a bias on your part -- or
> maybe
> you just don't know what the word "weird" means. Here, let Merriam-Webster
> help you: "of strange or extraordinary character"
>
> Is it your stance that the practices of female couples using the same
> sperm
> donor and swapping embryos occur in a large portion of the population?
> Female couples don't even comprise a large portion of the population!
> Therefore, Cat Cora's situation is BY DEFINITION weird. It is in no way an
> adverse reflection on her sexual preferences; it's a simple and obvious
> commentary on her outlying status in the demographics.


Exactly. That in vitro process was done for no other reason than to swap
embryos since each woman had born a child through insemination. The in
vitro process cost each of them about 10 grand. A mighty pricey way to make
a baby when it was simply not necessary. That shows me a very conceited,
narcissistic and self absorbed person. Couples resort to IVF because they
can't impregnate any other way. Those two had a choice.

That is weird to me.

Paul