"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> ster.com...
> >
> > "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
> >>
> >> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > Pete C. wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> It's not homophobic to say that something is weird,
> >> >>
> >> >> Care to tell me what is "weird" about a couple wanting to have
> >> >> children
> >> >> and using medical technology to overcome fertility issues? It's only
> >> >> "weird" if you are biased against the couple for some reason i.e.
> >> >> you're
> >> >> homophobic.
> >> >
> >> > It's not weird to want children. It *is* weird to use medical
> >> > technology
> >> > to
> >> > overcome fertility issues, regardless of whether the people involved
> >> > are
> >> > straight or ***. Your hyperreactivity shows a bias on your part -- or
> >> > maybe
> >> > you just don't know what the word "weird" means. Here, let
> >> > Merriam-Webster
> >> > help you: "of strange or extraordinary character"
> >> >
> >> > Is it your stance that the practices of female couples using the same
> >> > sperm
> >> > donor and swapping embryos occur in a large portion of the population?
> >> > Female couples don't even comprise a large portion of the population!
> >> > Therefore, Cat Cora's situation is BY DEFINITION weird. It is in no way
> >> > an
> >> > adverse reflection on her sexual preferences; it's a simple and obvious
> >> > commentary on her outlying status in the demographics.
> >>
> >> Exactly. That in vitro process was done for no other reason than to swap
> >> embryos since each woman had born a child through insemination. The in
> >> vitro process cost each of them about 10 grand. A mighty pricey way to
> >> make
> >> a baby when it was simply not necessary. That shows me a very conceited,
> >> narcissistic and self absorbed person. Couples resort to IVF because
> >> they
> >> can't impregnate any other way. Those two had a choice.
> >>
> >> That is weird to me.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >
> > Your ignorance is showing now. Perhaps you need to look at what IVF
> > actually means.
> >
> > In IVF, eggs and sperm are harvested from the donors, and they are
> > combined in the test tube and then monitored for proper fertilization
> > and cell division. When they have progressed in cell division for a
> > certain period, the embryo is then implanted in the woman who will carry
> > the child, be it the egg donor or a surrogate.
> >
> > In very simple terms for your feeble mind, the "embryo swap" involved no
> > more effort than selecting the test tube with the embryos from the other
> > egg donor for implantation.
>
> One more time:
>
> IT WAS OPTIONAL. They have fully functioning reproductive systems as proven
> by their previous children not conceived by IVF. It was an optional
> procedure done FOR THE PURPOSE of swapping embryos. It was also a very
> expensive procedure. It was obviously done for vanity as in "hey let's be
> the coolest ******* couple and like swap our embryos, wouldn't that like ya
> know be so cool?" If you can give me one explanation about how *swapping*
> embryos between female partners is a method of overcoming infertility, I
> will withdrawal my conclusion as to you IQ.
>
> I apparently know much more about not only IVF but the subject which you
> cannot seem to follow with a roadmap and a GPS.
>
> Paul

You are still proving that you are a clueless homophobe and probable
religious loon.