"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> ster.com...
> >
> > "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
> >>
> >> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> >> ster.com...
> >> >
> >> > "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > Pete C. wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> It's not homophobic to say that something is weird,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Care to tell me what is "weird" about a couple wanting to have
> >> >> >> children
> >> >> >> and using medical technology to overcome fertility issues? It's
> >> >> >> only
> >> >> >> "weird" if you are biased against the couple for some reason i.e.
> >> >> >> you're
> >> >> >> homophobic.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It's not weird to want children. It *is* weird to use medical
> >> >> > technology
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > overcome fertility issues, regardless of whether the people involved
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > straight or ***. Your hyperreactivity shows a bias on your part --
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > maybe
> >> >> > you just don't know what the word "weird" means. Here, let
> >> >> > Merriam-Webster
> >> >> > help you: "of strange or extraordinary character"
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is it your stance that the practices of female couples using the
> >> >> > same
> >> >> > sperm
> >> >> > donor and swapping embryos occur in a large portion of the
> >> >> > population?
> >> >> > Female couples don't even comprise a large portion of the
> >> >> > population!
> >> >> > Therefore, Cat Cora's situation is BY DEFINITION weird. It is in no
> >> >> > way
> >> >> > an
> >> >> > adverse reflection on her sexual preferences; it's a simple and
> >> >> > obvious
> >> >> > commentary on her outlying status in the demographics.
> >> >>
> >> >> Exactly. That in vitro process was done for no other reason than to
> >> >> swap
> >> >> embryos since each woman had born a child through insemination. The
> >> >> in
> >> >> vitro process cost each of them about 10 grand. A mighty pricey way
> >> >> to
> >> >> make
> >> >> a baby when it was simply not necessary. That shows me a very
> >> >> conceited,
> >> >> narcissistic and self absorbed person. Couples resort to IVF because
> >> >> they
> >> >> can't impregnate any other way. Those two had a choice.
> >> >>
> >> >> That is weird to me.
> >> >>
> >> >> Paul
> >> >
> >> > Your ignorance is showing now. Perhaps you need to look at what IVF
> >> > actually means.
> >> >
> >> > In IVF, eggs and sperm are harvested from the donors, and they are
> >> > combined in the test tube and then monitored for proper fertilization
> >> > and cell division. When they have progressed in cell division for a
> >> > certain period, the embryo is then implanted in the woman who will
> >> > carry
> >> > the child, be it the egg donor or a surrogate.
> >> >
> >> > In very simple terms for your feeble mind, the "embryo swap" involved
> >> > no
> >> > more effort than selecting the test tube with the embryos from the
> >> > other
> >> > egg donor for implantation.
> >>
> >> One more time:
> >>
> >> IT WAS OPTIONAL. They have fully functioning reproductive systems as
> >> proven
> >> by their previous children not conceived by IVF. It was an optional
> >> procedure done FOR THE PURPOSE of swapping embryos. It was also a very
> >> expensive procedure. It was obviously done for vanity as in "hey let's
> >> be
> >> the coolest ******* couple and like swap our embryos, wouldn't that like
> >> ya
> >> know be so cool?" If you can give me one explanation about how
> >> *swapping*
> >> embryos between female partners is a method of overcoming infertility, I
> >> will withdrawal my conclusion as to you IQ.
> >>
> >> I apparently know much more about not only IVF but the subject which you
> >> cannot seem to follow with a roadmap and a GPS.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >
> > You are still proving that you are a clueless homophobe and probable
> > religious loon.
>
> Me, a religious loon? Yeah, OK. I guess my buddhist parents raised a jesus
> freak?
>
> Paul

I didn't specify what flavor of religious loon, they come in many
flavors.