Boron Elgar wrote:

> As I posted before, there are likely legal implications in all of this
> that might be used to provide parental rights to both women for both
> children.

If I understand this excerpt from the Cora's somewhat confusing press
release, multiple embryos were implanted in Jen and they aren't sure
whose egg she is carrying, and don't want to know:

"The Coras share a unique family story in which both women have carried
the other's biological child. Cat's pregnancy is a result of in-vitro
fertilization with Jennifer's embryo. The couple's sons, ages 5 years
and 23 months, were both carried by Jennifer. She was artificially
inseminated for her first pregnancy, but the second she carried to term
using Cat's embryo. In Jennifer's current pregnancy, both women's
embryos were implanted, so the biological mother is unknown. They do not
to plan to conduct DNA testing to determine the baby's biological mother."

And to think, we might have ended up with an Octo-Chef ... ;-)

--Lin (Who's yo mama?)