Pete C. wrote:

> It may have been "weird" decades ago when the technology was in it's
> infancy, but it is most certainly not "weird" now unless you are biased.

Yes, by the definition of "weird," it's still weird.


>> Is it your stance that the practices of female couples using the same
>> sperm donor and swapping embryos occur in a large portion of the
>> population?
>
> "Infrequent" does not equate to "weird".

Yes, it does. That which is not frequent is strange. Is English perhaps not
your native language?



>> Female couples don't even comprise a large portion of the population!
>> Therefore, Cat Cora's situation is BY DEFINITION weird.
>
> Nope, "Infrequent" or perhaps "uncommon", but not "weird".
>
>> It is in no way an
>> adverse reflection on her sexual preferences; it's a simple and obvious
>> commentary on her outlying status in the demographics.
>
> Nope, it's a biased pejorative comment based on your prejudice.

Ya know, I don't think you are REALLY as stupid as the things you post, so
you must just be trolling with the "homophobe" bait. Troll somewhere else,
loser.

Bob