"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Pete C. wrote:
>
>> It may have been "weird" decades ago when the technology was in it's
>> infancy, but it is most certainly not "weird" now unless you are biased.
>
> Yes, by the definition of "weird," it's still weird.
>
>
>>> Is it your stance that the practices of female couples using the same
>>> sperm donor and swapping embryos occur in a large portion of the
>>> population?
>>
>> "Infrequent" does not equate to "weird".
>
> Yes, it does. That which is not frequent is strange. Is English perhaps
> not
> your native language?
>
>
>
>>> Female couples don't even comprise a large portion of the population!
>>> Therefore, Cat Cora's situation is BY DEFINITION weird.
>>
>> Nope, "Infrequent" or perhaps "uncommon", but not "weird".
>>
>>> It is in no way an
>>> adverse reflection on her sexual preferences; it's a simple and obvious
>>> commentary on her outlying status in the demographics.
>>
>> Nope, it's a biased pejorative comment based on your prejudice.
>
> Ya know, I don't think you are REALLY as stupid as the things you post, so
> you must just be trolling with the "homophobe" bait. Troll somewhere else,
> loser.


Don't be so sure about that last part. I've seen worse. He could very well
be for real.

Paul