Duwop wrote:

> Dana Myers wrote:
>
>>Duwop wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Or, if you use Outlook Express
>>
>>Geez, top-posting is the *last* thing I'd
>>worry when talking about OE, the conduit
>>to constant virus innundation even if you
>>stay on top of Windows Update.
>>
>>Dana
>
>
> Hey thanks for your opinion there Dana, hope you're not gonna charge us for
> all this received wisdom.
>
> So far this morning we got from you:
> Only buy wine in restaraunts, it sucks to pour it yourself (for reason(s)
> not given)

Well, the poster was asking about drinking wine in a public place,
writing:

"And how do you get away with drinking wine in a public place :-)"

I wrote "pouring out" meaning, if busted for drinking in
public, one of the things that often happens IMHO is you're
asked to pour out the beverage onto the ground. That sucks.

Do you disagree with this?

> Windoz is virus heaven, even though I've not received one virus in 4 years
> thanks to my router.

Your router won't save from many of the current generation of
Windows viruses, which exploit behaviors in Outlook and IE that
have nothing to with your router.

> Your complaining about other people complaining about other people wastes
> bandwidth

Actually, I'm complaining about people complaining about top-posting.
It's just so below the threshold of anything that matters.

> Told someone they were wrong to suggest baby backs

No, I suggested that spareribs might be a better *first time*
thing to smoke. This is consistent with the BBQ FAQ 2.0,
quoting from section 10.1.1:

> Spare ribs are inexpensive and full of flavor and are probably
> the best choice for novice barbecuers. You won't feel near as
> bad if you mess up a rack of spare ribs as you will if you
> mess an expensive rack of baby backs.

So it's not like I'm alone in giving that advice.

> Told Harry he did it all wrong without suggesting a better solution.
> And finally, it's somehow wrong, hell it's Fascistic to familiarize someone
> with this group.
>
> Medications run out?

Oh, I must have said something you disagree with but
are not able to discuss objectively, so you turn to an
ad hominem attack. You really showed me.

Geez.

Dana