Dave the spammer wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 8:34 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> > Dave the spammer wrote:
> >
> > > Read the blog or don't read the blog, makes no matter to me, because I
> > > posted the whole article here, not some teaser. My blog is just a
> > > gathering of such opinion pieces, without one single ad. Plenty of my
> > > own editorial comments, however!
> >
> > The ads are in the content of the articles themselves.
> > They promote products that the spammer is "affiliated"
> > with, hence has a commercial interest in pimping.
> >
> > Make no mistake -- it is a commercial spam site,
> > despite the spammer's attempt to spin it as otherwise.
>
> Mark, you go yammering on with the same things all the time, no matter
> what forum you post to. You seem to be quite mild mannered on this
> forum, but in most you are known as a terrible troll, wasting far more
> space in your "Masked Avenger of the Usenet" role than any real
> spammers, anywhere!

It only seems like the same thing to you, because I correctly
identify you as a spammer posting in non-commercial
discussion newsgroups where advertising is explicitly
forbidden. Your Internet-get-rich-quick scheme has
gone over like a lead balloon, and that has you bouncing
off the walls with rage. Too bad, spammer.