View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Dave[_25_] Dave[_25_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Red Meat Consumption vs. White Meat Consumption

On Mar 24, 4:14*pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> Dave the spammer wrote:
>
> > On Mar 23, 8:34 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> > > Dave the spammer wrote:

>
> > > > Read the blog or don't read the blog, makes no matter to me, because I
> > > > posted the whole article here, not some teaser. My blog is just a
> > > > gathering of such opinion pieces, without one single ad. Plenty of my
> > > > own editorial comments, however!

>
> > > The ads are in the content of the articles themselves.
> > > They promote products that the spammer is "affiliated"
> > > with, hence has a commercial interest in pimping.

>
> > > Make no mistake -- it is a commercial spam site,
> > > despite the spammer's attempt to spin it as otherwise.

>
> > Mark, you go yammering on with the same things all the time, no matter
> > what forum you post to. You seem to be quite mild mannered on this
> > forum, but in most you are known as a terrible troll, wasting far more
> > space in your "Masked Avenger of the Usenet" role than any real
> > spammers, anywhere!

>
> It only seems like the same thing to you, because I correctly
> identify you as a spammer posting in non-commercial
> discussion newsgroups where advertising is explicitly
> forbidden. *Your Internet-get-rich-quick scheme has
> gone over like a lead balloon, and that has you bouncing
> off the walls with rage. *Too bad, spammer.


This is hilarious. Mark, I just saw this same post, REPEATED 32 times.
YOUR EXACT WORDS, over and over again. (Can't you at least be
creative?) You've used up far more "space" with your attacks than
anyone you've attacked did. I posted a full text article about a topic
that is obviously on target in this forum (see the discussion above)
and it is no different than if I had printed CNN's version of the same
information. Full text, no ads, nothing but a link to the source. (And
in the blog, as in most of my comments on the science, there's a link
back to the original journal article.) You've got nothing to stand on,
and it is infuriating to you. My suggestion is to go find a real
spammer, and then write that person emails as opposed to littering up
the usenet. You should be ashamed of yourself.

D.