On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:21:47 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 26, 9:05*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:37:57 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>> On Mar 26, 7:32*am, Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>> I've devised a new tactic. *When somebody in line in front of you
>>>> has more than 10 items, I just cut in front of them, look back at
>>>> them and point to the sign, and say, "This lane is for people with
>>>> 10 items or less".
>>
>>>> And since that worked so well, loookie he the next person in
>>>> front of me has about 14 items, so lets do that again... *Worked
>>>> again [evil stare].
>>
>>>> And then the next person in front of me already had her stuff on the
>>>> conveyer. *She was apparently watching this, counts her stuff, then
>>>> looks at me and asks if I'd like to go in front of her, too. *I
>>>> said, "Nah - I don't want to press my luck."
>>
>>>> I'm going to do that more often. *Since the stores won't enforce
>>>> these policies, then it's up to the customers.
>>
>>> That's a really excellent idea. *You do a service to your community.
>>
>> you wouldn't force-feed them laxatives?
>
> That would in no way make the punishment fit the crime. Are you too
> simple to realize that?
>>

if the punishment fit the crime, you would go shit on your neighbor's lawn,
not poison his dog. are you too simple to realize that?

blake