Nancy2 wrote:

> On Mar 31, 1:14*pm, "Curtis" > wrote:
> > Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> >
> > > Curtis wrote:
> > > > Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> > > > > > For ****'s sake, someone who isn't an idiot post a good
> > > > > > recipe NOW.
> >
> > > > > You have to have an education beyond preschool to understand
> > > > > the subtle complexities of 'sloppy joes'.
> >
> > > > > An opposable thumb is also a necessity.
> >
> > > > > Your contributions here suggest a lack of both.
> >
> > > > > Stick to scavenging road kill, you wont notice any difference.
> >
> > > > Is everyone on these NGs a ****ing idiot? Is it too ****ing
> > > > hard for one of you to post a sloppy Joe recipe?
> >
> > > If any one believed you were really interested in a recipe it
> > > would have been supplied, as it is all you want is some
> > > attention, so given the style in which you seek attention you
> > > shouldn't be surprised by the type your getting.
> >
> > I'm sick of reading your trash now. Either post a recipe, or ****
> > off.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Has someone got a gun to your head? If the trash is making you sick,
> log off.
>
> N.

All I want is a ****ing sloppy Joe recipe. Don't bother replying in
future unless you have one. Understand?