Curtis wrote:
> Nancy2 wrote:
>
>
>>On Mar 31, 1:14*pm, "Curtis" > wrote:
>>
>>>Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Curtis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>For ****'s sake, someone who isn't an idiot post a good
>>>>>>>recipe NOW.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You have to have an education beyond preschool to understand
>>>>>>the subtle complexities of 'sloppy joes'.
>>>>>
>>>>>>An opposable thumb is also a necessity.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Your contributions here suggest a lack of both.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Stick to scavenging road kill, you wont notice any difference.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is everyone on these NGs a ****ing idiot? Is it too ****ing
>>>>>hard for one of you to post a sloppy Joe recipe?
>>>>
>>>>If any one believed you were really interested in a recipe it
>>>>would have been supplied, as it is all you want is some
>>>>attention, so given the style in which you seek attention you
>>>>shouldn't be surprised by the type your getting.
>>>
>>>I'm sick of reading your trash now. Either post a recipe, or ****
>>>off.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>Has someone got a gun to your head? If the trash is making you sick,
>>log off.
>>
>>N.
>
>
> All I want is a ****ing sloppy Joe recipe. Don't bother replying in
> future unless you have one. Understand?
>
We understand you have some need to demonstrate your stupidity.
--
JL