(2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:01 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:37:11 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:53:04 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:30:28 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:16:38 -0500, Andy > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Everyone should always remain present and accounted for until the end of
>>>>>time.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, come on. Only active posters should be on the mugshots page.
>>>> What "active" means will be defined later. My cut off is 6 months to
>>>> a year of no posting.
>>>>
>>>
>>>what ****ing difference does it make? the page loads in about three
>>>seconds for me (d.s.l.).
>>>
>>>why are you so het up about this?
>>>
>> I live in the here and now, not the past.
>
>how new-agey of you. guess you'll have to put up with us dinosaurs, huh?
>
You post regularly, pal. My beef is with those who lurk or have been
gone for what seems like forever.
--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
|