On Apr 10, 5:17*pm, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
> > On 09 Apr 2009 15:13:58 GMT, Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>
> > > Lynn from Fargo Ografmorffig >
> > :
> > > in rec.food.cooking
>
> > >> *I think you're right, Michael. *I remember Casey vs ?? (US Supreme
> > >> Court case further restricting Roe v. Wade) in the late 80s. *The
> > >> court left standing the first section of Missouri's law which
> > >> basically granted "personhood" and citizenship to embryos.
> > >> Lynn in Fargo
>
> > > I vaguely remember the hoopla surrounding it. *Missouri is just barely a
> > > step above Arkansas on the state level. Kentucky is as bad as Arkansas.
> > > It'll require some type of Federal legislation to bring some of the
> > > states in line with the others. *Who really knows though? *Some of the
> > > states have yet to realize the US is a republic, and not a theocracy.
>
> > > Michael
>
> > what were the various state laws at *the time of loving v. virginia (when
> > laws banning interracial marriage were struck down)? *i could see a
> similar
> > path (if it were not for some mossbacks on the court like scalia, thomas,
> > and alito, damn their black, flabby hearts).
>
> There was an Op-Ed in yesterday's _New York Times_ by a bi-racial guy, his
> mother was white and his father was black, both from Nebraska. *They had to
> go to Iowa to get married in 1958, Nebraska had a miscenegation law on the
> books until 1963...Iowa apparently never had any such law.
>
> --
> Best
> Greg
>
> "The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other
> people's money."~~~~Margaret Thatcher

I think it is not equalizing marriage, but redefining marriage. A
marriage between a black and a white is still man + woman. Now it is
"*** marriage" which I guess is the term we'll use to define a
marriage that is not between a man + woman. Anyway I am sooo glad
that it's the states that decide. These are issues that need to be
addressed state level. I love people and I especially love happy
people. I do have views, and I am thoughtful and considerate of
others and have served in the military along with some in my family
who have died serving. I may not agree with you, but I have
sacrificed for you to have the freedom to express your view, and hope
that there are others that see the need or calling to protect your
future ability as well.