No top-posting in uk.misc, c*nt!#

"bof" > wrote in message
...
>
> Dang,let's see if this works
>
>
>
> In message >, bof >
> writes
>>
>>I'm not sure that Mr Broadhurst reads either of the two groups you posted
>>to, so I've reinstated the x-post to u.m.
>>
>>HTH HAND SHANDY ETC
>>
>>
>>
>>In message >, James Silverton
> writes
>>>Mr. wrote on Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:39:36 +0100:
>>>
>>>> "james" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> In message >, Richard
>>>>> Tobin > writes
>>>>>> In article > ,
>>>>>> Wader of Doom > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whoever would have thought that he would top-post though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When commenting on a post as a whole, rather than
>>>>>> participating in a discussion, top-posting is the right
>>>>>> thing to do. Think of it as a post-it note stuck to a
>>>>>> letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Top posting is never correct in the Usenet. Jim
>>>>> Follett
>>>
>>>>Except when it's funny.
>>>
>>>The humor escapes me here, please explain. I think top-posting implies
>>>that the poster considers the quoted part so tremendously interesting
>>>that everyone will be familiar with it without re-reading. Perhaps, also
>>>it agrees with Oscar Wilde, who said, I believe, that he never listened
>>>to conversations because he was thinking about what he was going to say.
>>>
>>
>
> --
> bof at bof dot me dot uk