In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:12:22 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:

> > Thanks for the tip. Perhaps they have some good authors. Perhaps also,
> > they are improving. The last year or so, when I do a Google search, and
> > see about.com, I just don't click on it. I've seen too much poorly
> > written junk.
> >
> >> <http://chinesefood.about.com/od/dims...sic_chinese.ht
> >> m>
>
> it is true that there's fair amount of rubbish at about.com. her newsltter
> has links to some pretty pedestrian stuff in other sites under the
> about.com umbrella..

Thanks again to you and Victor for your tips. But, I don't even mind
"pedestrian" that much. There are two things that bother me:

1. People who are paid to write who don't even run their stuff through
a spell checker!

2. Very simple information that is Just Plain Wrong.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

"[Don't] assume that someone is "broken" just because they behave in ways
you don't like or don't understand." --Miche