Sqwertz > wrote:

> What I never understood is that I thought, in England, crisps were
> chips, and fries were chips. So the whole legal battle never made
> much sense to me - forcing them to call them "crisps" (potato chips)
> when they're clearly not french fries either.

I confused myself - Let me revise this:

What I never understood is that I thought, in England, crisps were
chips, and chips were fries. So the whole legal battle never made
much sense to me - forcing them to call them "crisps" (potato chips)
while they weren't either!

-sw