I'll never!!!
On Apr 30, 2:00*pm, Andy > wrote:
> Dimitri said...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Andy" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Dimitri said...
>
> >>> "Andy" > wrote in message news:Xns9BFD865694DF6CotD@
> >> 216.196.97.131...
> >>>> I'll never!!!
>
> >>>> I'll never put a dime into buying a Flat!
>
> >>>> Never ever ever!
>
> >>>> Especially not to rescue Chrysler.
>
> >>>> Who's the fool?
>
> >>>> Flat is the no purpose car company America ever heard of.
>
> >>>> Name a flat model off the top of your head!??
>
> >>>> Andy
>
> >>> Fiat 124 Spyder
> >>> Topolino (worlds most popular car at one time) AKA Fiat 500 1937
> >>> Fiat Abarth Coupe
>
> >>> For many years FIAt was the # 1 car maker in the world.
>
> >>> They been around for a few years.
>
> >>> Dimitri
>
> >> Dimitri,
>
> >> <snipped>
>
> >> While a great car and a great model line as you so expertly pointed
> >> out, whose going to make a better Fiat?
>
> >> You and I and most others know Chrysler won't improve the Fiat line.
> >> Rather
> >> just succeed in destroying it.
>
> >> That said, I haven't seen many Fiats on the roads in and around town.
>
> >> Best,
>
> >> Andy
> >> --
> >> Eat first, talk later.
>
> > Andy,
>
> > I think your vision or perspective has narrowed. The object is not for
> > Chrysler to fix Fiat it is for Fiat to fix Chrysler.
>
> > It is important to remember Fiat has 2 great histories, *The first is
> > making " the peoples cars" their 500 CC & 600 CC Little mouse (Topolino)
> > was the best selling car in the world, *Secondly they are very adept at
> > understanding foreign markets as illustrated by their world wide joint
> > ventures.
>
> > The Chapter 11 that Chrysler has now entered will have several effects;
>
> > First it can *void the UAW contracts.
> > Second it will reduce a major portion of their debt -
>
> > Why did they file - simple the creditors could not agree on a debt
> > reduction formula and the government said ENOUGH.
>
> > I suspect after all is said and done the Money that Fiat will pay will
> > ultimately end up in the hands of the lawyers and the creditors in order
> > to settle for some percentage of their debt. *Until that time a DIP
> > (Debtor in Possession) is in fact running the company.
>
> > Without question there are gross over simplifications for a very complex
> > problem.
>
> > Dimitri
>
> Dimitri,
>
> All good points!
>
> Now think, why did Dymler/Chrysler go their separate ways?
>
> I wouldn't want to get into bed with Chrysler if I was Fiat.
>
You really should get your prescription refilled.
|