On Sun, 10 May 2009 11:27:15 -0500, Michel Boucher
> wrote:

> The result 'is' different, so one would think that the term would be specific to
>the result, but not so. It seems that there is a vagueness in the
>application of the English language here (watch somebody make something out
>of THAT one).

Really depends upon what the definition of 'is' is.

--
mad