On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:32:25 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
> wrote:

>On May 15, 11:49*pm, sf > wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy > wrote:
>> >> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>>
>> >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
>> >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
>> >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>>
>> >> Andy
>>
>> What two partys are you talking about?
>
>Any two hypothetical parties.. The "get a room" was a play on chat
>room. I was wondering why move a conversation to chat. Privacy?
>Surely not. Speed, yeah, there's that. The whole "get a room"
>concept is funny to me because I don't mind public displays of
>affection. Except at nudist camps, where such things pose a serious
>threat to the existence of free body culture, I'm even fine with it
>going beyond mere affection.
>

I've seen certain people dis exchanges like that here and suggest they
take it to email. I guess with rfc, they certainly could take it to
chat.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.