What happened to Rec.Food.Reipes?
In article >,
"Jean B." > wrote:
> >> My immediate thoughts would be:
> >>
> >> 1. Recipe-oriented
> >> 2. Discussion of recipes and prose related to the recipes allowed
> >> (but then where do you draw the line, so you don't slip into banter?)
> >> 3. Tried and true recipes only (made clear in some way with the
> >> submission) UNLESS someone asks for a specific recipe--and then
> >> the fact that is has not been tried should be made clear.
> >
> > Sounds like it'd be naught but an allegory. <g>
> > Or a synonym...
>
> What are your thoughts on this, Om?
>
> --
> Jean B.
Being more liberal.
Tastes are very much an individual thing, and I personally go by
instinct when I'm cooking. I only follow recipes if I'm baking or
making sausage so I'd let most recipes thru IF they sounded like they
were not a troll.
Some things are obvious, like chocolate and fish do NOT go together. <g>
--
Peace! Om
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.
|