"Mack A. Damia" schrieb :
> On Fri, 22 May 2009 17:44:52 +0200, "Michael Kuettner" wrote:
>
>
>>Good-bye and enjoy your ignorance.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Michael Kuettner
>
> Right. I'm allowed to change my mind. As I said, you're one
> contentious soul. I think you must suffer, too.
>
I don't suffer from anything except Anglo-Saxon ignorance of
European history.

> You can give your slant on history, and I can give mine. We really
> don't know cuz we weren't there.
>
What slant on history ?
There was no "Germany" before 1871. That's a fact...

> Your arguments are specious at best and you make assertions that are
> only speculation.
>
Name some, my dear boy.
You see, vague accusations without explicitly stating what you're
objecting to makes you sound like a - well - kook.

> There are millions of guys like you haunting Usenet to start arguments
> and flame instead of flowing with the issues.
>
You think gentle corrections are a flame ?
Curious ...

> You also support your assertions with meaningless nitpicking - German
> versus Germanic, ad nauseum.
>
Meaningless ? You really like to dig further down after reaching
rock-bottom ?

> The post was about German (Germanic) influences in Mexico - and all
> you could do is attempt to find fault.
>
No, I corrected some points in your flawed world-view.
You still haven't stated what you regard as "German" influences.
Further, you failed to address any of my objections.

> You silly twisted boy.

Instead, the best you can come up with is silly name-calling.
That's not a very good show, old boy.

I know that most Anglo-Saxon speakers don't know very much about
continental Europe. That's OK. But don't try to push your dumbed-down
"history" as the real thing.

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner