On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:10 -0500, Michel Boucher
> wrote:

>Orlando Enrique Fiol > wrote in
:
>
>> If such radical notions as parental licensing, much more comprehensive
>> sex education or even compulsory sterilization in some cases were not
>> deemed so socially odious, we'd have a good chance of fostering
>> greater parental responsibility.
>
>There are reasons why not doing that is the case.

Please list a few.

>And in the end, we are the better for not stepping into the quagmire where we
>empower an elite to decide the fate of all citizens.

So are you saying lazy-useless-parasites should decide the fate of
those who not only have dreams, but follow through on them?
>
>Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

You're a freak. Do you even know how to cook? All you ever do is
talk your liberal bullshit. Your act might be easier to tolerate if
you got involved in cooking threads once in awhile but I've not seen
them.

Lou