On Jun 14, 2:35*pm, bulka > wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2:07 pm, sf > wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:16:19 -0700 (PDT), bulka
>
> > > wrote:
> > >Some of you have good sigs that I may steal. *Or, you could send me
> > >some one-liners.
>
> > Here's good site to borrow sayings fromhttp://www.cowboyway.com/CowboyQuotes.htm
>
> > --
> > I love cooking with wine.
> > Sometimes I even put it in the food.
>
> Yes, thank you. *Yours is one of the first I planned on taking. *Along
> with other favorites that I don't remember who to credit:
>
> Do you want to measure or do you want to cook?

Boy, if that isn't the truth. That why my wife is the primary baker
and I'm the cook.
>
> What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it is all about?

That's something that I'm sure many thousands of people independently
thought up w/o ever having heard it elsewhere. I pushed Hokeypokeyism
back in high school, 1976, along with another fake religion, Smiling
Fishreligion. The advantages of both are clear. Neither requires
that you screw up your weekend by sticking a Sunday morning or
Saturday evening service into the middle of it. Neither has any kind
of moral code, so you don't have to have your fun constrained by
guilt. The advantage to Smiling Fishreligion is that all you had to
do was wear Smiling Fish pins, t-shirts, whatever, and you would be
instantly recognized by other Smiling Fishreligion adherents as being
someone unconstrained by archaic moral codes, but the advantage to ME
was that unlike Hokeypokeyism--which is based on a well known dance,
and hence, untrademarkable--Smiling Fishreligion could be trademarked,
and I could benefit monetarily from the sale of the Smiling Fish
regalia.

Yes, I've been crazy for several decades. I bet Mr. Kuthe remembers
Smiling Fish. We met in summer school after my 9th grade (his 10th
grade).
>
> B

--Bryan