On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:25:10 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Jun 17, 5:55*pm, sf > wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:54:35 GMT, blake murphy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>>On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:49:35 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:41:46 +0200, "Giusi" >
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>"sf" *ha scritto nel messaggio
>>>>> "Fred" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>When roasting a chicken (or anything really) using standard roasting dish
>>>>>>>in >>oven, will it be quicker with or without the lid? *Thermowave or
>>>>>>>bake?
>>
>>>>>> No one is less respected here than shills and spammers.
>>
>>>>>What's he shilling or spamming?
>>
>>>> Have you actually *heard* of Thermowave? *Yes, it's a real product,
>>>> but Thermowave or bake? *Convection or bake... ok. *but Thermowave?
>>>> He's shilling.
>>
>>>one ****ing word is evidence of spam?
>>
>> Maybe our definitions of SPAM are different. *I didn't notice him
>> posting the same thing in every other ng I visit. *That's SPAM to me.
>
> I don't assume that everyone who is a fan of something-or-another is a
> spammer.
> Some folks here accused me of spamming for calling attention to my
> band's album in this one NG, for a couple of weeks after it was
> released, and at the end of posts. It was pointed out that it was not
> formatted properly as a sig, but whatever. I'm not a stranger here,
> and whether someone likes me or detests me, doesn't mean that it is
> legit to call me a spammer.

oh, i think it does.

blake