Ophelia wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>>>>>> The message >
>>>>>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>>>>>> posted using a sockpuppet
>>>>>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her
>>>>>> assorted allies.
>>>>>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of
>>>>>> the participants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to
>>>>> have left that bit out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now,
>>>>> having done so, I feel unclean *boke*
>>>>
>>>> You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.
>>>
>>> I would rather not, thank you *retch*
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think
>> she's got anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.
>
> Even more astonishing that you read it and responded


I realised that cyberkittie was a good egg and we now get along fine (I
always knew that, even when I was slagging her all the time).. In Jill's
case I finally had to admit to myself that over the years she's been a
top-class harridan...


--
Best
Greg