In article >, Andy > wrote:

> elaich said...
>
> > Janet Wilder > wrote in news:0009ec69$0$2389$c3e8da3
> > @news.astraweb.com:
> >
> >> I wasn't thrilled with any of the recipes, but I'm glad it's back. We
> >> all should search our files and contribute.
> >
> > From what she posted, she's been spending all this time going through the
> > backlog and sorting it out. We shouldn't make things worse for her right
> > now by sending more.
>
>
> R.F.R is for morons!!!
>
> We have infinitely superior peer-reviewable recipe websites all over the web!
>
> Because of old-fashioned moderation, R.F.R will always be the junkyard for
> crap recipe disposal.

r.f.r is a perennial group that dates back to before the existence of
the world wide web and its first browser, Mosaic. For old timers like
myself, there is a feeling of tradition in it. Also, I have seen ideas
that I would never have searched for. The one nice thing about its
being moderated is that it has been spared the obnoxious onslaught that
is spam (the non-edible type). If you choose to not read it, that is
your choice, but I will continue to browse it, and I am glad a new
moderator has stepped in to bring it back to life.

jt