On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:16:08 -0500, Andy wrote:

> jt august said...
>
>> In article >, Andy > wrote:
>>
>>> elaich said...
>>>
>>> > Janet Wilder > wrote in
>>> > news:0009ec69$0$2389$c3e8da3 @news.astraweb.com:
>>> >
>>> >> I wasn't thrilled with any of the recipes, but I'm glad it's back.
>>> >> We all should search our files and contribute.
>>> >
>>> > From what she posted, she's been spending all this time going through
>>> > the backlog and sorting it out. We shouldn't make things worse for
>>> > her right now by sending more.
>>>
>>> R.F.R is for morons!!!
>>>
>>> We have infinitely superior peer-reviewable recipe websites all over
>>> the web!
>>>
>>> Because of old-fashioned moderation, R.F.R will always be the junkyard
>>> for crap recipe disposal.
>>
>> r.f.r is a perennial group that dates back to before the existence of
>> the world wide web and its first browser, Mosaic. For old timers like
>> myself, there is a feeling of tradition in it. Also, I have seen ideas
>> that I would never have searched for. The one nice thing about its
>> being moderated is that it has been spared the obnoxious onslaught that
>> is spam (the non-edible type). If you choose to not read it, that is
>> your choice, but I will continue to browse it, and I am glad a new
>> moderator has stepped in to bring it back to life.
>
> jt,
>
> I'm not one for censorship (moderation). You keep on living in YOUR past.
>
> I've been online since 1969.
>
> You're no old-timer. You're a DIMWIT!!!
>
> LOLOL!!!
>
> Andy

good old andy, junkyard for extraneous crap since 1969. take a bow, big
guy!

blake