On Jul 22, 8:30*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:41:00 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 5:13*pm, Food Snob® > wrote:
> >> My dog is named, "Dog the Dog." *
>
> > Not a very original name.
>
> >> He is a sheepdog.
>
> > Do you mean the breed, or that he tends sheep.
>
> >> I have a cat too. *The cat is crazy. *She climbs the walls.
>
> > Climbs the walls? *How?
>
> >> *One good thing about her is that she never begs for people food.
>
> > Not even fish?
>
> >> --Bryan
>
> > --Bryan
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > OK. *As you can see the replying poster replied after the part of the
> > original post that was relevant. *One could reply to the whole post at
> > the end, but answering point by point is more organized. *One could
> > omit the original poster's sig, but leaving it in (At least the name.
> > Other parts of the sig can be snipped) is a reminder to anyone else
> > reading it who was being answered. *The replying poster's sig is
> > automatically tacked onto the end by newsreaders. *Since I use
> > GoogleGroups, I have to add it manually. *Again, at the very end.
>
> why? *anyone can tell from the beginning of the message who you are
> replying to. *you mean to tell me you *make a special effort* to include
> the original poster's name after your reply? *how foolish.

Not deleting doesn't require special effort. You are a real asshole,
and you are a real asshole who just happens to have a personal dislike
of me. When you criticize me, you have no credibility because it is
so obvious that you are chomping at the bit to find any fault in
anything that I write. As nasty as you are to me, you can be
sickeningly patronizing to some of the others here. It's pathetic. I
see why Andy hates you so much, though I don't share that hate because
you really do seem pathetic.

Oh, and if you had read carefully you'd have seen that it was MY sig
that I had to add manually because of using a web-based newsreader.
>
> blake

--Bryan