On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:13:31 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:

> koko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:31:56 -0400, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:41:06 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>>>> I can't see anything inappropriate/boring about discussing cookbooks
>>>> right here. I dunno about other news services, but when I go to
>>>> my 'Subscribe to newsgroups' list, the 'Description' for
>>>> rec.food.cooking is listed as "Food, cooking, cookbooks and
>>>> recipes".
>>>>
>>>> Besides, as somebody else pointed out, those that aren't interested
>>>> can skip the threads - especially if you come up with some sort
>>>> of 'standardized' subject line that indicates that it's a cookbook
>>>> thread... maybe start the thread with "CB:" (or something like
>>>> that?) that way folks can easily set up a filter if they're not
>>>> interested.
>>>>
>>>> Just my two cents.
>>>
>>>god damn it, there you go being sensible again.
>>>
>>>your outraged pal,
>>>blake
>>
>> I agree. Sensibility has no place here.
>> Wait until the Cabal (tinc) hears about this.
>>
>> another outraged pal.
>>
>> koko
>
> Oops. Sorry guys, I'll try and be less sensible in future. <eg>

really. good thing it doesn't seem to be contagious.

your pal,
blake